This summer the Tate Modern is opening a new gallery. That's no unusual thing, sure. 21st-century museums are flexible structures, opening new spaces or revamping old ones as the seasons change.
But this is no ordinary space, no polished white cube or cavernous display room. It is three old oil tanks. Drained of their oily cargo, the tanks are relics from the days when Tate Modern’s colossally-proportioned redbrick building had another purpose as Bankside Power Station.
In a fashionably honest way, Tate’s new space is called ‘The Tanks’. And they have been given a further dollop of character with a designated purpose as live art and film venues. Being given such a large, dedicated gallery space is an uncommon gift to the arts of dance, live performance, experimental film and cinema. Only in the latter-half of the 20th century have these media found a place in the museum’s catalogue.
To celebrate The Tanks opening, a fifteen-week showcase of live art and film begins from 18th July. Our coverage of the event starts with an interview of Belgian choreographer Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker.
Photo by Mirjam Devriendt.
One of the most important choreographers of modern dance, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker is The Tanks’ opening act. (Not too long ago, you may have heard of how Beyoncé controversially borrowed De Keersmaeker’s dance for the music video of Countdown.)
Anne Teresa preforms her influential dance work, Fase, this week — a work she conceived of in 1982 aged just 21. The dance is complex and beautiful. It explores patterns of everyday movement and the emotion of a quiet gesture. Don’t miss watching it in person this week at the Tate. For a teaser, watch her performance Rosas Danst Rosas here.
You’re opening Tate Modern’s new live art space, The Tanks, with a performance of Fase. What do you think of the space?
The space is like a womb. They aren’t really ‘tanks’. The presence of the concrete is very strong. It’s a totally non-conventional space for dance because it doesn’t invite the audience to the front to watch the performance. Dance is seen in the round, and so invites movement from the audience. Performers and audiences will get into different relationships as a result and that will be a challenge.
For Fase, we adapted the piece so it will be radical and stripped down, to get the bareness of the dancing and the bareness of the space. There’s something harsh about the tanks.
Were you always going to be a dancer?
No, first I was into music, not dance. And if I hadn’t been accepted into MUNDRA dance school in Brussels, I might even have gone into classical language or medicine.
Photo: A still from Fase (1982). Note the simple, almost casual costumes, and the beautiful manner in which the two figures, (Anne Teresa is on the left) are joined by their shadows.
You also studied in New York at the Tisch Dance School after your studies in Brussels. How did the dance culture in America compare to that you experienced in Europe?
I was 21 and it was my first time out of Belgium. New York in the early eighties was very different from how it is today. It was poorer; it was dangerous. Artistically, there were a lot of things going on both in music and dance. It would be a lie to say that Belgium has no dance history but it is definitely not one you can compare to the history of dance in the United States.
You’ve spoken about how children dance in the past, and how this has inspired some of your work. Can you elaborate on this?
When I started dancing, it was nothing particularly spectacular: just like how many little girls dance. So from the beginning I was developing a language of dance that was based on a simple, childlike vocabulary of movement.
When you ask a child to dance they will start turning, jumping, waving their arms and swinging their hips. And that is what dance is about: turning, jumping and waving, all combined with music. There’s also a tension between something extremely controlled and a sense of anarchy, of letting go. Combining extreme control and disorder is my dance.
You’ve been a professional dancer and choreographer for thirty years now. How do you experience ageing in this profession?
When you dance you make something that is very human. It’s your body that you’re using and of course the passage of time is in your body as well. To feel those changes is hard sometimes.
For dancers, the body is a means of communicating: it’s a tool. I’m extremely lucky that I can still dance the performances that I’m doing at the Tate Modern, and the other pieces that I made first thirty years ago. That’s a long time to live with the same dance.
Photo: A still from Fase (1982).
I think one of the most common experiences of dance today is in popular music videos. Do you feel an appreciation for this context of dance?
Yes, definitely. Dance and music work in the 21st century more than others. It’s the way of global communication in a sense. It’s what we share. And it gives people the possibility of expressing what is extremely close and dear to them, and with which they can identify with larger communities. But I have more questions about it than statements.
What would some of your questions be?
I don’t know. A lot of that dancing is more and more explicitly sexualised. Although, I think that dance is always about that basic drive and seduction is crucial in it.
Find information and details on the collaboration with Tate online. Anne Teresa’s dance group, Rosas, have an online home here.